Delhi police have initiated a criminal investigation into the death of Aman Sharma, a 30-year-old civil judge and secretary of the District Legal Services Authority (North East District), after he was found dead at his residence in Green Park on Saturday. Officers responded to a call from a relative around 1:45 pm, reporting that Sharma had locked himself in the bathroom. The circumstances have prompted authorities to treat the incident as a suspected suicide, triggering a forensic and legal review of potential external pressures leading to the act. While no official cause of death has been confirmed, the case has drawn immediate attention due to Sharma's position within the judiciary.

A case of abetment to suicide and criminal conspiracy has been formally registered under relevant sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) at Safdarjung Enclave police station. The FIR was filed following a complaint by Sharma's father, who alleged prolonged harassment by his son's in-laws. Investigators have not disclosed whether any individuals have been named in the initial report, and police officials have refrained from commenting on the specifics of the allegations. Standard procedure now involves collecting digital evidence, conducting witness interviews, and reviewing any documented instances of conflict or coercion.

Aman Sharma was a graduate of Symbiosis Law School, Pune, completing his BA LLB in 2018 before joining the Delhi Judicial Services on June 19, 2021. He served as a judicial magistrate first class and civil judge, handling a wide range of criminal and civil cases. On October 18, he assumed the role of full-time secretary at the DLSA, Karkardooma Courts—a position that underscores both his professional competence and administrative responsibilities within the legal aid framework. His relatively young age and recent career advancement highlight the personal and institutional loss occasioned by his death.

The case is likely to reignite discussions about the psychological pressures faced by judicial officers, particularly those in early-career positions within overburdened court systems. Simultaneously, the abetment charge—often contentious in matrimonial disputes—may prompt scrutiny of how such allegations are investigated and prosecuted under the new BNS framework. Legal experts anticipate cautious handling of the inquiry, given the sensitivity of implicating family members in a public servant's death. Moving forward, the investigation's trajectory will depend on the emergence of tangible evidence supporting coercion or harassment. The incident may also prompt institutional reviews of mental health support mechanisms for judges and judicial staff across the national capital and beyond.