The CBI's narrow focus on ADAG officials has sparked concerns about the agency's commitment to uncovering the truth behind the alleged siphoning of 40,000 crore from bank loans. Petitioner Prabhas Bajaj, who first brought the issue to the Supreme Court's attention, has complained that the agency has failed to hold the group's kingpin accountable.

The CBI's justification for this selective approach lies in the complexities of the case and the discovery of new facts and dimensions, which have allegedly delayed the probe beyond the initially promised four-week timeline.

However, the Supreme Court's displeasure with the probe agencies' reluctance to proceed against ADAG group companies suggests that the agency's explanation may not be entirely convincing.

In a recent hearing, the court expressed its frustration with the slow pace of the investigation and ordered the CBI and Enforcement Directorate (ED) to submit status reports.

The reports, handed over to the court by Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, have only fueled concerns about the agency's ability to tackle the case effectively.

Meanwhile, ADAG officials have been quick to capitalize on the situation, suggesting that the group is willing to discuss settlement of dues with banks and financial institutions.

However, the court's focus remains on the systemic issues underlying the insolvency proceedings, which have allowed solvent companies to be taken over cheaply by other companies, causing significant losses to banks.